Re: [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 00/14] s390x: new maintainer, refactor linker scripts, tests for misalignments, execute-type instructions and vSIE epdx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31/03/2023 13.30, Nico Boehr wrote:
Hi Paolo and/or Thomas,

here comes the first pull request from me. :)

Thanks!

... I gave it a try, but I'm hitting a failure in the spec_ex test:

$ cat logs/spec_ex.log
timeout -k 1s --foreground 90s qemu-system-s390x -nodefaults -nographic -machine s390-ccw-virtio,accel=kvm -chardev stdio,id=con0 -device sclpconsole,chardev=con0 -kernel s390x/spec_ex.elf -smp 1 # -initrd /tmp/tmp.cxHP06rT1F
PASS: specification exception: psw_bit_12_is_1: Program interrupt: expected(6) == received(6)
PASS: specification exception: short_psw_bit_12_is_0: Program interrupt: expected(6) == received(6)
FAIL: specification exception: psw_odd_address: Expected exception due to invalid PSW
PASS: specification exception: odd_ex_target: did not perform ex with odd target
PASS: specification exception: odd_ex_target: Program interrupt: expected(6) == received(6)
PASS: specification exception: bad_alignment_lqp: Program interrupt: expected(6) == received(6)
PASS: specification exception: bad_alignment_lrl: Program interrupt: expected(6) == received(6)
PASS: specification exception: not_even: Program interrupt: expected(6) == received(6)
PASS: specification exception during transaction: odd_ex_target: Program interrupt: expected(518) == received(518)
PASS: specification exception during transaction: bad_alignment_lqp: Program interrupt: expected(518) == received(518)
PASS: specification exception during transaction: bad_alignment_lrl: Program interrupt: expected(518) == received(518)
PASS: specification exception during transaction: not_even: Program interrupt: expected(518) == received(518)
SUMMARY: 12 tests, 1 unexpected failures

EXIT: STATUS=3

I'm sure I'm missing something, I just cannot figure it out right
now (it's Friday afternoon...) - QEMU is the current version from
the master branch, so I thought that it should contain all the
recent fixes ... does this psw_odd_address test require a fix in
the kernel, too? (I'm currently running a RHEL9 kernel)

 Thomas




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux