> On Mar 30, 2023, at 1:18 PM, Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> !! External Email
>
> On 30.03.2023 23:13, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> This adds conversion of VMCI specific error code to general -ENOMEM. It
>> is needed, because af_vsock.c passes error value returned from transport
>> to the user, which does not expect to get VMCI_ERROR_* values.
>
> @Stefano, I have some doubts about this commit message, as it says "... af_vsock.c
> passes error value returned from transport to the user ...", but this
> behaviour is implemented only in the next patch. Is it ok, if both patches
> are in a single patchset?
>
> For patch 1 I think it is ok, as it fixes current implementation.
>
> Thanks, Arseniy
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Code change looks good to me. Will let you figure out the commit message
with Stefano. Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 11 +++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
>> index 95cc4d79ba29..b370070194fa 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
>> @@ -1831,10 +1831,17 @@ static ssize_t vmci_transport_stream_dequeue(
>> size_t len,
>> int flags)
>> {
>> + ssize_t err;
>> +
>> if (flags & MSG_PEEK)
>> - return vmci_qpair_peekv(vmci_trans(vsk)->qpair, msg, len, 0);
>> + err = vmci_qpair_peekv(vmci_trans(vsk)->qpair, msg, len, 0);
>> else
>> - return vmci_qpair_dequev(vmci_trans(vsk)->qpair, msg, len, 0);
>> + err = vmci_qpair_dequev(vmci_trans(vsk)->qpair, msg, len, 0);
>> +
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>> static ssize_t vmci_transport_stream_enqueue(
>
> !! External Email: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
