Re: [PATCH] Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics from host side

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 07:41 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 07:27 AM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > From: Zhang, Yanmin<yanmin_zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Based on the discussion in KVM community, I worked out the patch to support
> > perf to collect guest os statistics from host side. This patch is implemented
> > with Ingo, Peter and some other guys' kind help. Yang Sheng pointed out a
> > critical bug and provided good suggestions with other guys. I really appreciate
> > their kind help.
> >
> > The patch adds new subcommand kvm to perf.
> >
> >    perf kvm top
> >    perf kvm record
> >    perf kvm report
> >    perf kvm diff
> >
> > The new perf could profile guest os kernel except guest os user space, but it
> > could summarize guest os user space utilization per guest os.
> >
> > Below are some examples.
> > 1) perf kvm top
> > [root@lkp-ne01 norm]# perf kvm --host --guest --guestkallsyms=/home/ymzhang/guest/kallsyms
> > --guestmodules=/home/ymzhang/guest/modules top
> >
> >    
> 
Thanks for your kind comments.

> Excellent, support for guest kernel != host kernel is critical (I can't 
> remember the last time I ran same kernels).
> 
> How would we support multiple guests with different kernels?
With the patch, 'perf kvm report --sort pid" could show
summary statistics for all guest os instances. Then, use
parameter --pid of 'perf kvm record' to collect single problematic instance data.

>   Perhaps a 
> symbol server that perf can connect to (and that would connect to guests 
> in turn)?

> 
> > diff -Nraup linux-2.6_tipmaster0315/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c linux-2.6_tipmaster0315_perfkvm/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > --- linux-2.6_tipmaster0315/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c	2010-03-16 08:59:11.825295404 +0800
> > +++ linux-2.6_tipmaster0315_perfkvm/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c	2010-03-16 09:01:09.976084492 +0800
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> >   #include<linux/sched.h>
> >   #include<linux/moduleparam.h>
> >   #include<linux/ftrace_event.h>
> > +#include<linux/perf_event.h>
> >   #include "kvm_cache_regs.h"
> >   #include "x86.h"
> >
> > @@ -3632,6 +3633,43 @@ static void update_cr8_intercept(struct
> >   	vmcs_write32(TPR_THRESHOLD, irr);
> >   }
> >
> > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, kvm_in_guest) = {0};
> > +
> > +static void kvm_set_in_guest(void)
> > +{
> > +	percpu_write(kvm_in_guest, 1);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int kvm_is_in_guest(void)
> > +{
> > +	return percpu_read(kvm_in_guest);
> > +}
> >    
> 

> There is already PF_VCPU for this.
Right, but there is a scope between kvm_guest_enter and really running
in guest os, where a perf event might overflow. Anyway, the scope is very
narrow, I will change it to use flag PF_VCPU.

> 
> > +static struct perf_guest_info_callbacks kvm_guest_cbs = {
> > +	.is_in_guest 		= kvm_is_in_guest,
> > +	.is_user_mode		= kvm_is_user_mode,
> > +	.get_guest_ip		= kvm_get_guest_ip,
> > +	.reset_in_guest		= kvm_reset_in_guest,
> > +};
> >    
> 
> Should be in common code, not vmx specific.
Right. I discussed with Yangsheng. I will move above data structures and
callbacks to file arch/x86/kvm/x86.c, and add get_ip, a new callback to
kvm_x86_ops.

Yanmin


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux