Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/3] lib: s390x: Introduce UV validity function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 12:04:29 +0000
Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> PV related validities are in the 0x20** range but the last byte might
> be implementation specific, so everytime we check for a UV validity we
> need to mask the last byte.
> 
> Let's add a function that checks for a UV validity and returns a
> boolean.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  lib/s390x/uv.h | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/uv.h b/lib/s390x/uv.h
> index 5fe29bda..78b979b7 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/uv.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/uv.h
> @@ -35,4 +35,11 @@ static inline void uv_setup_asces(void)
>  	lctlg(13, asce);
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool uv_validity_check(struct vm *vm)
> +{
> +	uint16_t vir = sie_get_validity(vm);
> +
> +	return vm->sblk->icptcode == ICPT_VALIDITY && (vir & 0xff00) == 0x2000;
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* UV_H */




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux