Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: Provide generic way to read system counter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 28, 2023, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 19:10:04 +0000,
> Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > In context, I'm trying to measure the time it takes to write to a buffer
> > *with dirty memory logging enabled*. What do you mean by zero? I can
> > confirm from running this code I am not measuring zero time.
> 
> See my earlier point: the counter tick is a few MHz, and the CPU
> multiple GHz.

On x86, the system counter (TSC) counts at multiple GHz, so we should be able to
continue with that approach for x86.

> So unless "whatever" is something that takes a significant time (several
> thousands of CPU cycles), you'll measure nothing using the counter. Page
> faults will probably show, but not a normal access.
> 
> The right tool for this job is to use PMU events, as they count at the CPU
> frequency.

Out of curiosity, what does the kernel end up using for things like ndelay()?  I
tried to follow the breadcrumbs for ARM and got as far as arm_arch_timer.c, but
after that I'm more than a bit lost.



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux