"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue Mar 28, 2023 at 3:43 AM AEST, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >> > On Thu Mar 23, 2023 at 3:41 AM AEST, Sean Christopherson wrote: ... >> > > >> > > What is the long term plan for KVM PPC maintenance? I was under the impression >> > > that KVM PPC was trending toward "bug fixes only", but the addition of selftests >> > > support suggests otherwise. ... > >> and ideally there would be one or more M: (and R:) entries as well. I'm not >> all that concerned about the selftests support being abandoned, but the lack of >> specific contacts makes it look like KVM PPC is in maintenance-only mode, and it >> sounds like that's not the case. > > Yeah, I guess the intention was to bring it a bit more under general > arch/powerpc maintainership but it does look a bit odd having a top > level entry and no contacts. We'll reconsider what to do with that. Yeah I agree it ends up looking a bit weird. The intention was just to make it clear that Paul's tree was no longer where patches were being handled, and that they'd be handled as regular powerpc patches. At the time I hoped we'd relatively quickly be able to add someone as at least a KVM "R:"eviewer, but circumstances intervened. Hopefully we can fix that soon. cheers
