On Montag, 27. März 2023 18:49:31 CEST Andy Chiu wrote:
> From: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch adds ptrace support for riscv vector. The vector registers will
> be saved in datap pointer of __riscv_v_ext_state. This pointer will be set
> right after the __riscv_v_ext_state data structure then it will be put in
> ubuf for ptrace system call to get or set. It will check if the datap got
> from ubuf is set to the correct address or not when the ptrace system call
> is trying to set the vector registers.
>
> Co-developed-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 7 +++
> arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/elf.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c
> index 23c48b14a0e7..75e66c040b64 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -80,6 +84,61 @@ static int riscv_fpr_set(struct task_struct *target,
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V
> +static int riscv_vr_get(struct task_struct *target,
> + const struct user_regset *regset,
> + struct membuf to)
> +{
> + struct __riscv_v_ext_state *vstate = &target->thread.vstate;
> +
> + if (!riscv_v_vstate_query(task_pt_regs(target)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Ensure the vector registers have been saved to the memory before
> + * copying them to membuf.
> + */
> + if (target == current)
> + riscv_v_vstate_save(current, task_pt_regs(current));
> +
> + /* Copy vector header from vstate. */
> + membuf_write(&to, vstate, offsetof(struct __riscv_v_ext_state,
datap));
> + membuf_zero(&to, sizeof(void *));
No idea why I have not seen it in any previous version, but this "sizeof(void
*)" just made me thing "what is going on here?". I personally would have
written something like "sizeof(to.var)" or "offsetof(to.buf)" or something like
that. That makes it easier for me to understand what is skipped/zeroed here,
let alone making it a bit more fool proof when someone changes one of the
struct layouts. YMMV.
Regards,
Eike
--
Rolf Eike Beer, emlix GmbH, http://www.emlix.com
Fon +49 551 30664-0, Fax +49 551 30664-11
Gothaer Platz 3, 37083 Göttingen, Germany
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Göttingen, Amtsgericht Göttingen HR B 3160
Geschäftsführung: Heike Jordan, Dr. Uwe Kracke – Ust-IdNr.: DE 205 198 055
emlix - smart embedded open source
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
