Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] KVM: SVM: Flush Hyper-V TLB when required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



jpiotrowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> From: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The Hyper-V "EnlightenedNptTlb" enlightenment is always enabled when KVM
> is running on top of Hyper-V and Hyper-V exposes support for it (which
> is always). On AMD CPUs this enlightenment results in ASID invalidations
> not flushing TLB entries derived from the NPT. To force the underlying
> (L0) hypervisor to rebuild its shadow page tables, an explicit hypercall
> is needed.
>
> The original KVM implementation of Hyper-V's "EnlightenedNptTlb" on SVM
> only added remote TLB flush hooks. This worked out fine for a while, as
> sufficient remote TLB flushes where being issued in KVM to mask the
> problem. Since v5.17, changes in the TDP code reduced the number of
> flushes and the out-of-sync TLB prevents guests from booting
> successfully.
>
> Split svm_flush_tlb_current() into separate callbacks for the 3 cases
> (guest/all/current), and issue the required Hyper-V hypercall when a
> Hyper-V TLB flush is needed. The most important case where the TLB flush
> was missing is when loading a new PGD, which is followed by what is now
> svm_flush_tlb_current().
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.17+
> Fixes: 1e0c7d40758b ("KVM: SVM: hyper-v: Remote TLB flush for SVM")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/43980946-7bbf-dcef-7e40-af904c456250@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Resending because I accidentally used the wrong "From:" address and it bounced
> from some recipients.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - lookup enlightened_npt_tlb in vmcb to determine whether to do the
>   flush
> - when KVM wants a hyperv_flush_guest_mapping() call, don't try to
>   optimize it out
> - don't hide hyperv flush behind helper, make it visible in
>   svm.c
>
>  arch/x86/kvm/kvm_onhyperv.h     |  5 +++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c          | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h | 15 +++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_onhyperv.h b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_onhyperv.h
> index 287e98ef9df3..67b53057e41c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_onhyperv.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_onhyperv.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,11 @@ int hv_remote_flush_tlb_with_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>  int hv_remote_flush_tlb(struct kvm *kvm);
>  void hv_track_root_tdp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, hpa_t root_tdp);
>  #else /* !CONFIG_HYPERV */
> +static inline int hv_remote_flush_tlb(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	return -1;
> +}

Nitpick: -ENOTSUPP?

> +
>  static inline void hv_track_root_tdp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, hpa_t root_tdp)
>  {
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 252e7f37e4e2..f25bc3cbb250 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -3729,7 +3729,7 @@ static void svm_enable_nmi_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	svm->vmcb->save.rflags |= (X86_EFLAGS_TF | X86_EFLAGS_RF);
>  }
>  
> -static void svm_flush_tlb_current(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static void svm_flush_tlb_asid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>  
> @@ -3753,6 +3753,37 @@ static void svm_flush_tlb_current(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		svm->current_vmcb->asid_generation--;
>  }
>  
> +static void svm_flush_tlb_current(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	hpa_t root_tdp = vcpu->arch.mmu->root.hpa;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * When running on Hyper-V with EnlightenedNptTlb enabled, explicitly
> +	 * flush the NPT mappings via hypercall as flushing the ASID only
> +	 * affects virtual to physical mappings, it does not invalidate guest
> +	 * physical to host physical mappings.
> +	 */
> +	if (svm_hv_is_enlightened_tlb_enabled(vcpu) && VALID_PAGE(root_tdp))
> +		hyperv_flush_guest_mapping(root_tdp);

Nitpick: it could also make sense to yell with a WARN_ON_ONCE() or
something if hyperv_flush_guest_mapping() ever fails.

> +
> +	svm_flush_tlb_asid(vcpu);
> +}
> +
> +static void svm_flush_tlb_all(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * When running on Hyper-V with EnlightenedNptTlb enabled, remote TLB
> +	 * flushes should be routed to hv_remote_flush_tlb() without requesting
> +	 * a "regular" remote flush.  Reaching this point means either there's
> +	 * a KVM bug or a prior hv_remote_flush_tlb() call failed, both of
> +	 * which might be fatal to the guest.  Yell, but try to recover.
> +	 */
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(svm_hv_is_enlightened_tlb_enabled(vcpu)))
> +		hv_remote_flush_tlb(vcpu->kvm);
> +
> +	svm_flush_tlb_asid(vcpu);
> +}
> +
>  static void svm_flush_tlb_gva(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
>  {
>  	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> @@ -4745,10 +4776,10 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __initdata = {
>  	.set_rflags = svm_set_rflags,
>  	.get_if_flag = svm_get_if_flag,
>  
> -	.flush_tlb_all = svm_flush_tlb_current,
> +	.flush_tlb_all = svm_flush_tlb_all,
>  	.flush_tlb_current = svm_flush_tlb_current,
>  	.flush_tlb_gva = svm_flush_tlb_gva,
> -	.flush_tlb_guest = svm_flush_tlb_current,
> +	.flush_tlb_guest = svm_flush_tlb_asid,
>  
>  	.vcpu_pre_run = svm_vcpu_pre_run,
>  	.vcpu_run = svm_vcpu_run,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h
> index cff838f15db5..786d46d73a8e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
>  #ifndef __ARCH_X86_KVM_SVM_ONHYPERV_H__
>  #define __ARCH_X86_KVM_SVM_ONHYPERV_H__
>  
> +#include <asm/mshyperv.h>
> +
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
>  
>  #include "kvm_onhyperv.h"
> @@ -15,6 +17,14 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops;
>  
>  int svm_hv_enable_l2_tlb_flush(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  
> +static inline bool svm_hv_is_enlightened_tlb_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct hv_vmcb_enlightenments *hve = &to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->control.hv_enlightenments;
> +
> +	return ms_hyperv.nested_features & HV_X64_NESTED_ENLIGHTENED_TLB &&
> +	       !!hve->hv_enlightenments_control.enlightened_npt_tlb;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void svm_hv_init_vmcb(struct vmcb *vmcb)
>  {
>  	struct hv_vmcb_enlightenments *hve = &vmcb->control.hv_enlightenments;
> @@ -80,6 +90,11 @@ static inline void svm_hv_update_vp_id(struct vmcb *vmcb, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  }
>  #else
>  
> +static inline bool svm_hv_is_enlightened_tlb_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void svm_hv_init_vmcb(struct vmcb *vmcb)
>  {
>  }

Apart from the two nitpicks above,

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Vitaly




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux