On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:30:47AM +0000, Daniel K. wrote: > Joerg Roedel wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> index 2883ce8..9f8b02d 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> @@ -314,6 +314,19 @@ void kvm_inject_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long addr, >> kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, PF_VECTOR, error_code) >> } >> +void kvm_propagate_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long addr, >> u32 error_code) >> +{ >> + u32 nested, error; >> + >> + nested = error_code & PFERR_NESTED_MASK; >> + error = error_code & ~PFERR_NESTED_MASK; >> + >> + if (vcpu->arch.mmu.nested && !(error_code && PFERR_NESTED_MASK)) > > This looks incorrect, nested is unused. > > At the very least it should be a binary & operation > > if (vcpu->arch.mmu.nested && !(error_code & PFERR_NESTED_MASK)) > > which can be simplified to > > if (vcpu->arch.mmu.nested && !nested) > > but it seems wrong that the condition is that it is nested and not nested > at the same time. Yes, this is already fixed in my local patch-stack. I found it during further testing (while fixing another bug). But thanks for your feedback :-) Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html