Re: [PATCH] riscv: require alternatives framework when selecting FPU support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 08:26:10PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 03:17:13PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:

> > > (It's tempting to just select RISCV_ALTERNATIVE from RISCV, but maybe we
> > >  can defer that wedding a bit longer.)
> > 
> > At that point, the config option should just go away entirely, no?
> 
> Ah, yes, and that makes the idea even more attractive, as we could remove
> several ifdefs.

I went and did the cursory check, it's not compatible with XIP_KERNEL so
dropping the option entirely probably isn't a possibility :/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux