On Fri, Feb 10, 2023, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> @@ -1677,8 +1670,13 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
> static void clear_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
> gfn_t gfn, unsigned long mask, bool wrprot)
> {
> + /*
> + * Either all SPTEs in TDP MMU will need write protection or none. This
> + * contract will not be modified for TDP MMU pages.
> + */
> + u64 clear_bit = (wrprot || !kvm_ad_enabled()) ? PT_WRITABLE_MASK :
> + shadow_dirty_mask;
Switching from spte_ad_need_write_protect() to kvm_ad_enabled() belongs in a
separate. In the unlikely event that the above assertion/contracts is invalid,
then any issues should bisect to the switch, not to a much more complex patch.
I'll make that happen when applying.
