On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:42:09AM +0000,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-03-12 at 10:55 -0700, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > +
> > +static inline bool is_td(struct kvm *kvm)
> > +{
> > + return kvm->arch.vm_type == KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM;
> > +}
> > +
>
> KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM is defined in the next patch, which means this patch cannot
> compile.
>
> Also, why KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM == TDX VM?
This part needs to be resolved.
Use KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM as TDX VM or new type KVM_X86_TDX_VM or other way
to specify VM type.
Given pKVM is coming, dedicated VM type seems better. I'll switch it to
KVM_X86_TDX_VM next respin.
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
