In some ARM ARM ddi0487 revisions it is said that
disabling/enabling a pair of counters that are paired
by a CHAIN event should follow a given sequence:
Disable the low counter first, isb, disable the high counter
Enable the high counter first, isb, enable low counter
This was the case in Fc. However this is not written anymore
in Ia revision.
Introduce 2 helpers to execute those sequences and replace
the existing PMCNTENCLR/ENSET calls.
Also fix 2 write_sysreg_s(0x0, PMCNTENSET_EL0) in subtest 5 & 6
and replace them by PMCNTENCLR writes since writing 0 in
PMCNTENSET_EL0 has no effect.
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arm/pmu.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
index dde399e2..af679667 100644
--- a/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/arm/pmu.c
@@ -730,6 +730,22 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(bool unused)
read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0), \
read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0))
+static void enable_chain_counter(int even)
+{
+ write_sysreg_s(BIT(even), PMCNTENSET_EL0); /* Enable the high counter first */
+ isb();
+ write_sysreg_s(BIT(even + 1), PMCNTENSET_EL0); /* Enable the low counter */
+ isb();
+}
+
+static void disable_chain_counter(int even)
+{
+ write_sysreg_s(BIT(even + 1), PMCNTENCLR_EL0); /* Disable the low counter first*/
+ isb();
+ write_sysreg_s(BIT(even), PMCNTENCLR_EL0); /* Disable the high counter */
+ isb();
+}
+
static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
{
uint32_t events[] = {MEM_ACCESS, CHAIN};
@@ -768,16 +784,17 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
/* 1st COUNT with CHAIN enabled, next COUNT with CHAIN disabled */
report_prefix_push("subtest3");
pmu_reset();
- write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW2_32);
- isb();
+ enable_chain_counter(0);
PRINT_REGS("init");
mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
PRINT_REGS("After 1st loop");
/* disable the CHAIN event */
- write_sysreg_s(0x2, PMCNTENCLR_EL0);
+ disable_chain_counter(0);
+ write_sysreg_s(0x1, PMCNTENSET_EL0); /* Enable the low counter */
+ isb();
mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
PRINT_REGS("After 2d loop");
report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x1,
@@ -798,9 +815,11 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
PRINT_REGS("After 1st loop");
- /* enable the CHAIN event */
- write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+ /* Disable the even counter and enable the chain counter */
+ write_sysreg_s(0x1, PMCNTENCLR_EL0); /* Disable the low counter first */
isb();
+ enable_chain_counter(0);
+
mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
PRINT_REGS("After 2d loop");
@@ -824,10 +843,10 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
PRINT_REGS("After 1st loop");
/* 0 becomes CHAINED */
- write_sysreg_s(0x0, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+ write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENCLR_EL0);
write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
- write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, 0x0);
+ enable_chain_counter(0);
mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
PRINT_REGS("After 2d loop");
@@ -843,13 +862,13 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 0, MEM_ACCESS | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW2_32);
- write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+ enable_chain_counter(0);
PRINT_REGS("init");
mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
PRINT_REGS("After 1st loop");
- write_sysreg_s(0x0, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+ disable_chain_counter(0);
write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CPU_CYCLES | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
--
2.38.1
