Re: [PATCH v13 00/11] Parallel CPU bringup for x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2023-03-08 at 12:15 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> 
> >         /*
> >          * Encrypted guests other than SEV-ES (in the future) will need to
> >          * implement an early way of finding the APIC ID, since they will
> >          * presumably block direct CPUID too. Be kind to our future selves
> >          * by warning here instead of just letting them break. Parallel
> >          * startup doesn't have to be in the first round of enabling patches
> >          * for any such technology.
> >          */
> >         if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_STATE_ENCRYPT) || !has_sev_es) {
> >                 pr_info("Disabling parallel bringup due to guest memory encryption\n");
> >                 return false;
> >         }
> 
> That looks wrong, won't has_sev_es almost always be false
> so it prints the message and returns?
> Maybe s/||/&&/ ?

D'oh! Fixed; thanks.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux