----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "kvm" <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linuxppc-dev" <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 5:46:07 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems > On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 11:29:53 -0600 (CST) > Timothy Pearson <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> This patch series reenables VFIO support on POWER systems. It >> is based on Alexey Kardashevskiys's patch series, rebased and >> successfully tested under QEMU with a Marvell PCIe SATA controller >> on a POWER9 Blackbird host. >> >> Alexey Kardashevskiy (3): >> powerpc/iommu: Add "borrowing" iommu_table_group_ops >> powerpc/pci_64: Init pcibios subsys a bit later >> powerpc/iommu: Add iommu_ops to report capabilities and allow blocking >> domains >> >> Timothy Pearson (1): >> Add myself to MAINTAINERS for Power VFIO support >> >> MAINTAINERS | 5 + >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/iommu.h | 6 +- >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 7 + >> arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c | 246 +++++++++++++++++++++- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c | 2 +- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 36 +++- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 27 +++ >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h | 4 + >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c | 3 + >> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 96 ++------- >> 10 files changed, 338 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) >> > > For vfio and MAINTAINERS portions, > > Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I'll note though that spapr_tce_take_ownership() looks like it copied a > bug from the old tce_iommu_take_ownership() where tbl and tbl->it_map > are tested before calling iommu_take_ownership() but not in the unwind > loop, ie. tables we might have skipped on setup are unconditionally > released on unwind. Thanks, > > Alex Thanks for that. I'll put together a patch to get rid of that potential bug that can be applied after this series is merged, unless you'd rather I resubmit a v3 with the issue fixed?