Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Propagate AMD-specific IBRS bits to guests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/6/23 22:44, Borislav Petkov wrote:
I thought that the consensus was that adding unused-by-the-kernel flags to
cpufeatures.h is ok so long as the feature is hidden from /proc/cpuinfo and the
kernel already dedicates a word to the CPUID leaf?
I guess we should finally write it down in Documentation/x86/cpuinfo.rst

And in case there's no dedicated word, it should be resorted to KVM-only
feature flags.

In any case, I'd like for baremetal CPUID stuff to be decoupled from
KVM's machinery as far as possible as both have different goals wrt
feature flags.

It's very rare that KVM can provide a CPUID feature if the kernel has masked it, so if the kernel needs to know about a feature word than KVM most likely needs to know what kind of massaging the kernel has done.

Paolo




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux