On 06.03.2023 15:08, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 11:07:37PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> In case of SOCK_SEQPACKET all sk_buffs are used once - after read some
>> data from it, it will be removed, so user will never read rest of the
>> data. Thus we need to update credit parameters of the socket like whole
>> sk_buff is read - so call 'skb_pull()' for the whole buffer.
>>
>> Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff")
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Maybe we could avoid this patch if we directly use pkt_len as I
> suggested in the previous patch.
Hm, may be we can avoid calling 'skb_pull()' here if 'virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt()'
will use integer argument? Just call 'virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(skb->len)'. skb
is never returned to queue to read it again, so i think may be there is no sense for
extra call 'skb_pull'?
Thanks, Arseniy
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
>>
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> index 2e2a773df5c1..30b0539990ba 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> @@ -466,7 +466,6 @@ static int virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>> dequeued_len = err;
>> } else {
>> user_buf_len -= bytes_to_copy;
>> - skb_pull(skb, bytes_to_copy);
>> }
>>
>> spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>> @@ -484,6 +483,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>> msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
>> }
>>
>> + skb_pull(skb, skb->len);
>> virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, skb);
>> kfree_skb(skb);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
