On 03/03/23 19:35, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 2/20/23 19:38, Michael Roth wrote: >> From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@xxxxxxx> >> >> Do not pin the guest memory backed by a restrictedmem backend, as >> pages in the restrictedmem are already pinned. Instead, populate the >> pages array for these guests using the already-pinned pages provided by > > IIUC the "already pinned" became "effectively unmovable and unevictable" > since the earlier versions, so that would be more accurate now? Yes, that makes sense. Regards Nikunj
