Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering in the next >> call in 2 weeks. >> >> We have already topics: >> - single qemu binary >> People on previous call (today) asked if Markus, Paolo and Peter could >> be there on next one to further discuss the topic. >> >> - Huge Memory guests >> >> Will send a separate email with the questions that we want to discuss >> later during the week. >> >> After discussions on the QEMU Summit, we are going to have always open a >> KVM call where you can add topics. > > Hi Juan! > > I have a somewhat odd request: can I convince you to rename "KVM call" to something > like "QEMU+KVM call"? > > I would like to kickstart a recurring public meeting/forum that (almost) exclusively > targets internal KVM development, but I don't to cause confusion and definitely don't > want to usurp your meeting. The goal/purpose of the KVM-specific meeting would be to > do design reviews, syncs, etc. on KVM internals and things like KVM selftests, while, > IIUC, the current "KVM call" is aimed at at the entire KVM+QEMU+VFIO ecosystem. I can do that. I would have told you that you could use our slots, but right now we are quite low on slots. If nobody objects, I will change that for the next call. Later, Juan.
