Fix up both ASSERT_PMC_COUNTING and ASSERT_PMC_NOT_COUNTING in the
pmu_event_filter_test by adding additional context in the assert
message.
With the added context the print in ASSERT_PMC_NOT_COUNTING is
redundant. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
index 8277b8f49dca..78bb48fcd33e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
@@ -252,18 +252,17 @@ static struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *remove_event(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f,
#define ASSERT_PMC_COUNTING(count) \
do { \
- if (count != NUM_BRANCHES) \
+ if (count && count != NUM_BRANCHES) \
pr_info("%s: Branch instructions retired = %lu (expected %u)\n", \
__func__, count, NUM_BRANCHES); \
- TEST_ASSERT(count, "Allowed PMU event is not counting."); \
+ TEST_ASSERT(count, "%s: Branch instructions retired = %lu (expected > 0)", \
+ __func__, count); \
} while (0)
#define ASSERT_PMC_NOT_COUNTING(count) \
do { \
- if (count) \
- pr_info("%s: Branch instructions retired = %lu (expected 0)\n", \
- __func__, count); \
- TEST_ASSERT(!count, "Disallowed PMU Event is counting"); \
+ TEST_ASSERT(!count, "%s: Branch instructions retired = %lu (expected 0)", \
+ __func__, count); \
} while (0)
static void test_without_filter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
--
2.39.2.722.g9855ee24e9-goog
