On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 03:10:15PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Use the governed feature framework to track if XSAVES is "enabled", i.e.
> if XSAVES can be used by the guest. Add a comment in the SVM code to
> explain the very unintuitive logic of deliberately NOT checking if XSAVES
> is enumerated in the guest CPUID model.
>
> No functional change intended.
xsaves_enabled in struct kvm_vcpu_arch is no longer used. But instead of
just deleting it, maybe we could move 'bool load_eoi_exitmap_pending' to
its place, so 7 bytes can be saved for each struct kvm_vcpu_arch:
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index cd660de02f7b..0eef5469c165 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -740,7 +740,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
u64 efer;
u64 apic_base;
struct kvm_lapic *apic; /* kernel irqchip context */
- bool load_eoi_exitmap_pending;
DECLARE_BITMAP(ioapic_handled_vectors, 256);
unsigned long apic_attention;
int32_t apic_arb_prio;
@@ -750,7 +749,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
u64 smi_count;
bool at_instruction_boundary;
bool tpr_access_reporting;
- bool xsaves_enabled;
+ bool load_eoi_exitmap_pending;
bool xfd_no_write_intercept;
u64 ia32_xss;
u64 microcode_version;
B.R.
Yu
