Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] Parallel CPU bringup for x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21.02.2023 12:49, David Woodhouse wrote:
On 21 February 2023 11:46:04 GMT, Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 21.02.2023 11:27, David Woodhouse wrote:
On 21 February 2023 09:49:51 GMT, Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 21.02.2023 10:06, David Woodhouse wrote:
Why does arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c::x86_acpi_suspend_lowlevel() set

    initial_gs = per_cpu_offset(smp_processor_id()) ?

Would it not be CPU#0 that comes back up, and should it not get
per_cpu_offset(0) ?

Wanna me try `initial_gs = per_cpu_offset(0);` too?

Hm, yes please. There's another one to make zero on the next line up, I think?

So,

```
early_gdt_descr.address = (unsigned long)get_cpu_gdt_rw(0);
initial_gs = per_cpu_offset(0);
```

?

Should I leave `smpboot_control = 0;` commented out, or I should uncomment it back?

Put it back, else those things don't matter. Thanks.

With this in place:

```
	early_gdt_descr.address = (unsigned long)get_cpu_gdt_rw(0);
	initial_gs = per_cpu_offset(0);
	smpboot_control = 0;
```

the resume does not work.

--
  Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux