On 21 Feb 2023, at 10:40, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hey Christoph, > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 08:12:58AM +0100, Christoph Müllner wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The RISC-V Architectural Review Committee has discussed the concerns >> regarding the non-ratified chapters in the AIA specification. > > Thanks for the update! > >> Here is the relevant quote from the meeting minutes: >> """ >> Although the Advanced Interrupt Architecture (AIA) has already passed >> Architecture Review (with a minor edit still pending), the committee >> has some suggestions about its final steps to ratification, to avoid >> the AIA document having a mixture of ratified and non-ratified content: > >> - The AIA document's remaining draft chapter on the Duo-PLIC, which is >> not currently on a path to ratification, can be removed to a separate >> document. > > That sounds promising... > >> - Ratification of the full AIA (without Duo-PLIC) can be postponed to >> coincide with ratification of the IOMMU specification, given that >> the latter is now expected in a reasonable time, and the AIA's last >> chapter concerning IOMMUs is already scheduled to go through public >> review and be ratified only together with the IOMMU specification. >> """ > > ...and so does this. AIA stuff's acceptability only depending on the > IOMMU spec's freeze (and thus Chapter 9's) seems like a vast improvement > on the status quo to me! > >> The full meeting minutes can be found here: >> https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-chairs/message/1381 > > This link is non functional unfortunately :/ tech-chairs is private, for (co-)chairs only... not sure why it went there rather than tech-privileged. Jess > Cheers, > Conor. > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
