Re: Issue with "KVM: SEV: Add support for SEV intra host migration"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 16, 2023, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 2/16/23 19:18, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Depending on why the source VM needs to be cleaned up, one thought would be add
> > a dedicated ioctl(), e.g. KVM_DISMANTLE_VM, and make that the _only_ ioctl() that's
> > allowed to operate on a dead VM.  The ioctl() would be defined as a best-effort
> > mechanism to teardown/free internal state, e.g. destroy KVM_PIO_BUS, KVM_MMIO_BUS,
> > and memslots, zap all SPTEs, etc...
> 
> If we have to write the code we might as well do it directly at context-move
> time, couldn't we?  I like the idea of minimizing the memory cost of the
> zombie VM.

I thought about that too, but I assume the teardown latency would be non-trivial,
especially if KVM aggressively purges state.  The VMM can't resume the VM until
it knows the migration has completed, so immediately doing the cleanup would impact
the VM's blackout time.

My other thought was to automatically do the cleanup, but to do so asynchronously.
I actually don't know why I discarded that idea.  I think I got distracted and
forgot to circle back.  That might be something we could do for any and all
bugged/dead VMs.



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux