Avi Kivity wrote: [] >> In short, when vgabios were dropped from qemu-kvm >> (for whatever yet unknown reason), > > What do you mean? qemu-kvm still carries a local vgabios (see > kvm/vgabios in qemu-kvm.git). Oh my. So we all overlooked it. I asked you several times about the bios sources, in 0.12 seabios were supposed to be in roms/seabios (which is still empty in the release), and I thought vgabios should be in roms/vgabios (which is empty too), and concluded it were dropped from qemu-kvm tarball. But you're right, and I by mistake take vgabios sources from upstream qemu when building Debian package, instead of using the old'good sources from kvm/vgabios. What a mess!... :( And it looks like that it's time to remove at least parts of this mess, don't you think? How about pushing the vgabios changes to qemu and moving it to the same place where it is in qemu? Does it make sense? There were another patch mentioned recently when I asked for bios sources origin a few days ago which probably should be applied as well... [] >> Should vgabios in qemu include that patch? >> See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501545 > > Looks like Fedora was using the upstream vgabios for a while, not the > version in qemu-kvm.git. Yes they are still using upstream but they also applied the patches missing in there. Thank you for the prompt response. Now I think all confusion is cleared. /mjt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
