On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 12:10 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 12:53 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 09 2023 at 11:03, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > This one also fixes it for me. If we're happy with this approach, I'll > > > work it into Thomas's original patch (and hopefully eventually he'll be > > > happy enough with it and the commit message that he'll give us his > > > Signed-off-by for it.) > > > > I'm happy enough by now, but I'm not sure how much of the original patch > > is still left. Also you did the heavy lifting of making it work and > > writing the nice changelog. So please make this: > > > > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Co-developed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks. I'll flip that to the Amazon address, of course. It's useless > for actual email (until I apply that LART some more) but I should still > use it for that. > > I think I'm going to make one more change to that as I review it; in > the "should never happen" case of not finding the APIC ID in the > cpuid_to_apicid[] array it would just keep searching for ever. I don't > know if there's a better thing to do other than just dropping the > trampoline lock and 1:cli;hlt;jmp 1b but at least it's *attempting* to > handle the failure. > > Patch below, and I'll update the tree shortly. There's a "what if > there's noise in the top 32 bits of %rcx" fix in there too. All done and pushed out to parallel-6.2-rc7-part1 (and not -part1) branches. Usama, are you able to redo the testing and take it from here? Thanks for that; it's saving me a lot of time! I'm mostly done for the week now as by this time tomorrow, I need to have the skis on the roof of the car and be ready to pick the family up from school and start driving south...
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
