On 03/08/2010 02:09 AM, Asdo wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/07/2010 08:01 PM, Antoine Martin wrote:
Yes cache=none: "-drive file=./vm/var_fs,if=virtio,cache=none"
Side question: this is the right thing to do for raw partitions, right?
The rightest.
Isn't cache=writeback now safe on virtio-blk since 2.6.32?
Doesn't it provide better performances?
I thought it was best to let the guest deal with it? (single cache)
Also that looks like a raw file to me, not a partition... do they
follow the same optimization "rule"?
This is a device (/dev/sdc9) in the chroot, don't let the name fool you ;)
Antoine
Thank you
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
