On Tue, Feb 07, 2023, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07 2023 at 09:49, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 00:48 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> Aside of the 'We' this does not explain anything at all. > > > > Er, doesn't it? > > > > We refcount the warm reset vector because when we do parallel bringup, > > we'll want to set it up once and then put it back to normal (for cold > > reset) once all the CPUs are up. > > > > I can rework the phrasing; I'm aware that the whole nonsense about > > pronouns and the imperative mood has grown legs in the last couple of > > years since I originally wrote it — but is there anything actually > > missing? > > We can settle the imperative mood debate over a beer at the next > conference, but stuff which goes through tip is required to follow those > rules. No exception for you :) While we're reforming David, same goes for KVM x86. :-)
