On 07/02/2023 08:33, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 00:21:55 +0000 > Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> >> >> Define AVIC_VCPU_ID_MASK based on AVIC_PHYSICAL_MAX_INDEX, i.e. the mask >> that effectively controls the largest guest physical APIC ID supported by >> x2AVIC, instead of hardcoding the number of bits to 8 (and the number of >> VM bits to 24). > > Is there any particular reason not to tie it to max supported by KVM > KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS? > > Another question: > will guest fail to start when configured with more than 512 vCPUs > or it will start broken? > I think the problem is not so much the GATag (which can really be anything at the resolution you want). It's more of an SVM limit AIUI. Provided you can't have GATAgs if you don't have guest-mode/AVIC active, then makes sense have the same limit on both. SVM seems to be limited to 256 vcpus in xAPIC mode or 512 vcpus in x2APIC mode[0]. IIUC You actually won't be able to create guests with more than 512vcpus as KVM bound checks those max limits very early in the vCPU init (see avic_init_vcpu()). I guess the alternative would an AVIC inhibit if vCPU count goes beyond those limits -- probably a must have once avic flips to 1 by default like Intel. [0] in APM Volume 2 15.29.4.3 Physical Address Pointer Restrictions, * All the addresses point to 4-Kbyte aligned data structures. Bits 11:0 are reserved (except for offset 0F8h) and should be set to zero. The lower 8 bits of offset 0F8h are used for the field AVIC_PHYSICAL_MAX_INDEX. VMRUN fails with #VMEXIT(VMEXIT_INVALID) if AVIC_PHYSICAL_MAX_INDEX is greater than 255 in xAVIC mode or greater than 511 in x2AVIC mode.
