Re: KVM usability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/02/2010 11:34 AM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Tuesday, March 2, 2010, 9:21:18, Chris Webb wrote:

I remember about a year ago, someone asserting on the list that -usbdevice
tablet was very CPU intensive even when not in use, and should be avoided if
mouse support wasn't needed, e.g. on non-graphical VMs. Was that actually a
significant hit, and is it still true today?
It would appear that this is still the case, at least on slower hosts
- on Atom Z530 (1,6GHz), the XP VM uses ~30% CPU when idle with
-usbdevice tablet, but only ~4% without it. However, on a faster host
(Core2 Quad 2,66GHz), there's practically no difference (Vista x64 VM
uses ~1% CPU when idle regardless of -usbdevice tablet).

Looks like the tablet is set to 100 Hz polling rate. We may be able to get away with 30 Hz or even less (ep_bInterval, in ms, in hw/usb-wacom.c).

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux