Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: x86/cpuid: Add X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2 as a KVM-only leaf entry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/1/2023 3:47 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022, Like Xu wrote:
From: Like Xu <likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Alias X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2 for feature AMD_PMU_V2 in KVM-only leafs that
aren't scattered by cpufeatures.h so that it can be used in KVM, e.g. to
query guest CPUID.  As a bonus, no translation is needed for these features
in __feature_translate().

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h | 10 ++++++++++
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h
index a19d473d0184..7cfedb3e47c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
   */
  enum kvm_only_cpuid_leafs {
  	CPUID_12_EAX	 = NCAPINTS,
+	CPUID_8000_0022_EAX,
  	NR_KVM_CPU_CAPS,
NKVMCAPINTS = NR_KVM_CPU_CAPS - NCAPINTS,
@@ -23,7 +24,15 @@ enum kvm_only_cpuid_leafs {
  /* Intel-defined SGX sub-features, CPUID level 0x12 (EAX). */
  #define KVM_X86_FEATURE_SGX1		KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_12_EAX, 0)
  #define KVM_X86_FEATURE_SGX2		KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_12_EAX, 1)
+#define KVM_X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2	KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_0022_EAX, 0)
+/*
+ * Alias X86_FEATURE_* to the KVM variant for features in KVM-only leafs that
+ * aren't scattered by cpufeatures.h so that X86_FEATURE_* can be used in KVM,
+ * e.g. to query guest CPUID.  As a bonus, no translation is needed for these
+ * features in __feature_translate().
+ */
+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2      KVM_X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2

I gave you bad input earlier, for purely KVM-defined flags there's no need for an
intermediate KVM_X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2, this could simply be:

   #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2         KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_0022_EAX, 0)

That's a moot point though because, after much searching because I had a very hard
time believing the kernel wouldn't want to know about this flag, I found commit

   d6d0c7f681fd ("x86/cpufeatures: Add PerfMonV2 feature bit")

from nearly a year ago.  I.e. to avoid confusiong, this needs to be a scattered
flag, not a purely KVM flag.

---
  arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h | 7 +++++++
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h
index 4945456fd646..333e28b0a13c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ enum kvm_only_cpuid_leafs {
  	CPUID_12_EAX	 = NCAPINTS,
  	CPUID_7_1_EDX,
  	CPUID_8000_0007_EDX,
+	CPUID_8000_0022_EAX,
  	NR_KVM_CPU_CAPS,
NKVMCAPINTS = NR_KVM_CPU_CAPS - NCAPINTS,
@@ -47,6 +48,9 @@ enum kvm_only_cpuid_leafs {
  /* CPUID level 0x80000007 (EDX). */
  #define KVM_X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC	KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_0007_EDX, 8)
+/* CPUID level 0x80000022 (EAX) */
+#define KVM_X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2	KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_0022_EAX, 0)

I'm very confused and is this the usage you want to see:

	kvm_cpu_cap_set(KVM_X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2)
	kvm_cpu_cap_has(KVM_X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2)
	guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2)

? then what about X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2 ?

+
  struct cpuid_reg {
  	u32 function;
  	u32 index;
@@ -73,6 +77,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_reg reverse_cpuid[] = {
  	[CPUID_8000_001F_EAX] = {0x8000001f, 0, CPUID_EAX},
  	[CPUID_7_1_EDX]       = {         7, 1, CPUID_EDX},
  	[CPUID_8000_0007_EDX] = {0x80000007, 0, CPUID_EDX},
+	[CPUID_8000_0022_EAX] = {0x80000022, 0, CPUID_EAX},
  };
/*
@@ -107,6 +112,8 @@ static __always_inline u32 __feature_translate(int x86_feature)
  		return KVM_X86_FEATURE_SGX_EDECCSSA;
  	else if (x86_feature == X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC)
  		return KVM_X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC;
+	else if (x86_feature == X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2)
+		return KVM_X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2;
return x86_feature;
  }

base-commit: 5f3f3cc1279cd5cd52d301b97844bd3ce40c8020



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux