Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] kvm->lock vs. SRCU sync optimizations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/4/23 01:31, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2023 01:12:50 +0100, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>> This series is mostly about unlocking kvm->lock before synchronizing SRCU.
>> Discussed at https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/Y7dN0Negds7XUbvI@xxxxxxxxxx/ .
>>
>> I'm mentioning the fact it's an optimization (not a bugfix; at least under
>> the assumption that Xen does not break the lock order anymore) meant to
>> reduce the time spent under the mutex. Sean, would that suffice?
>>
>> [...]
> 
> Applied to kvm-x86 misc, thanks!
> 
> Note, I massaged a few changelogs to provide more context and justification,
> but didn't see a need to respond to individual patches.

Sure, thanks.

Michal




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux