Hi Janis, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on kvm/queue] [also build test ERROR on lwn/docs-next linus/master v6.2-rc5 next-20230127] [cannot apply to kvms390/next kvm/linux-next] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Janis-Schoetterl-Glausch/KVM-s390-selftest-memop-Pass-mop_desc-via-pointer/20230128-132603 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git queue patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230125212608.1860251-13-scgl%40linux.ibm.com patch subject: [PATCH v6 12/14] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg config: s390-randconfig-r022-20230123 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230128/202301282258.RvVJOYVA-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4196ca3278f78c6e19246e54ab0ecb364e37d66a) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/6e6b3d99b9978a70b148b989d46b039feda3a3c3 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Janis-Schoetterl-Glausch/KVM-s390-selftest-memop-Pass-mop_desc-via-pointer/20230128-132603 git checkout 6e6b3d99b9978a70b148b989d46b039feda3a3c3 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 olddefconfig COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash arch/s390/kvm/ If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c:16: In file included from arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h:17: In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:19: In file included from include/linux/msi.h:27: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75: include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16' #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x)) ^ In file included from arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c:16: In file included from arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h:17: In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:19: In file included from include/linux/msi.h:27: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75: include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x)) ^ In file included from arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c:16: In file included from arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h:17: In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:19: In file included from include/linux/msi.h:27: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75: include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ >> arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c:1217:9: error: call to undeclared function 'cmpxchg_user_key'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] ret = cmpxchg_user_key((u8 *)hva, &old, *old_addr, new, access_key); ^ arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c:1217:9: note: did you mean 'copy_to_user_key'? arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h:51:1: note: 'copy_to_user_key' declared here copy_to_user_key(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n, unsigned long key) ^ arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c:1225:9: error: call to undeclared function 'cmpxchg_user_key'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] ret = cmpxchg_user_key((u16 *)hva, &old, *old_addr, new, access_key); ^ arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c:1233:9: error: call to undeclared function 'cmpxchg_user_key'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] ret = cmpxchg_user_key((u32 *)hva, &old, *old_addr, new, access_key); ^ arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c:1241:9: error: call to undeclared function 'cmpxchg_user_key'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] ret = cmpxchg_user_key((u64 *)hva, &old, *old_addr, new, access_key); ^ arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c:1249:9: error: call to undeclared function 'cmpxchg_user_key'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] ret = cmpxchg_user_key((__uint128_t *)hva, &old, *old_addr, new, access_key); ^ 12 warnings and 5 errors generated. vim +/cmpxchg_user_key +1217 arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c 1163 1164 /** 1165 * cmpxchg_guest_abs_with_key() - Perform cmpxchg on guest absolute address. 1166 * @kvm: Virtual machine instance. 1167 * @gpa: Absolute guest address of the location to be changed. 1168 * @len: Operand length of the cmpxchg, required: 1 <= len <= 16. Providing a 1169 * non power of two will result in failure. 1170 * @old_addr: Pointer to old value. If the location at @gpa contains this value, 1171 * the exchange will succeed. After calling cmpxchg_guest_abs_with_key() 1172 * *@old_addr contains the value at @gpa before the attempt to 1173 * exchange the value. 1174 * @new: The value to place at @gpa. 1175 * @access_key: The access key to use for the guest access. 1176 * @success: output value indicating if an exchange occurred. 1177 * 1178 * Atomically exchange the value at @gpa by @new, if it contains *@old. 1179 * Honors storage keys. 1180 * 1181 * Return: * 0: successful exchange 1182 * * a program interruption code indicating the reason cmpxchg could 1183 * not be attempted 1184 * * -EINVAL: address misaligned or len not power of two 1185 * * -EAGAIN: transient failure (len 1 or 2) 1186 * * -EOPNOTSUPP: read-only memslot (should never occur) 1187 */ 1188 int cmpxchg_guest_abs_with_key(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa, int len, 1189 __uint128_t *old_addr, __uint128_t new, 1190 u8 access_key, bool *success) 1191 { 1192 gfn_t gfn = gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT; 1193 struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn); 1194 bool writable; 1195 hva_t hva; 1196 int ret; 1197 1198 if (!IS_ALIGNED(gpa, len)) 1199 return -EINVAL; 1200 1201 hva = gfn_to_hva_memslot_prot(slot, gfn, &writable); 1202 if (kvm_is_error_hva(hva)) 1203 return PGM_ADDRESSING; 1204 /* 1205 * Check if it's a read-only memslot, even though that cannot occur 1206 * since those are unsupported. 1207 * Don't try to actually handle that case. 1208 */ 1209 if (!writable) 1210 return -EOPNOTSUPP; 1211 1212 hva += offset_in_page(gpa); 1213 switch (len) { 1214 case 1: { 1215 u8 old; 1216 > 1217 ret = cmpxchg_user_key((u8 *)hva, &old, *old_addr, new, access_key); 1218 *success = !ret && old == *old_addr; 1219 *old_addr = old; 1220 break; 1221 } 1222 case 2: { 1223 u16 old; 1224 1225 ret = cmpxchg_user_key((u16 *)hva, &old, *old_addr, new, access_key); 1226 *success = !ret && old == *old_addr; 1227 *old_addr = old; 1228 break; 1229 } 1230 case 4: { 1231 u32 old; 1232 1233 ret = cmpxchg_user_key((u32 *)hva, &old, *old_addr, new, access_key); 1234 *success = !ret && old == *old_addr; 1235 *old_addr = old; 1236 break; 1237 } 1238 case 8: { 1239 u64 old; 1240 1241 ret = cmpxchg_user_key((u64 *)hva, &old, *old_addr, new, access_key); 1242 *success = !ret && old == *old_addr; 1243 *old_addr = old; 1244 break; 1245 } 1246 case 16: { 1247 __uint128_t old; 1248 1249 ret = cmpxchg_user_key((__uint128_t *)hva, &old, *old_addr, new, access_key); 1250 *success = !ret && old == *old_addr; 1251 *old_addr = old; 1252 break; 1253 } 1254 default: 1255 return -EINVAL; 1256 } 1257 mark_page_dirty_in_slot(kvm, slot, gfn); 1258 /* 1259 * Assume that the fault is caused by protection, either key protection 1260 * or user page write protection. 1261 */ 1262 if (ret == -EFAULT) 1263 ret = PGM_PROTECTION; 1264 return ret; 1265 } 1266 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
