Hi Ricardo,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 09:43:53PM +0000, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Extend the read-only memslot tests in page_fault_test to test
> read-only PT (Page table) memslots. Note that this was not allowed
> before commit 406504c7b040 ("KVM: arm64: Fix S1PTW handling on RO
> memslots") as all S1PTW faults were treated as writes which resulted
> in an (unrecoverable) exception inside the guest.
More of a style nit going forward (don't bother respinning):
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c
> index 2e2178a7d0d8..54680dc5887f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c
> @@ -829,8 +829,9 @@ static void help(char *name)
>
> #define TEST_RO_MEMSLOT(_access, _mmio_handler, _mmio_exits) \
> { \
> - .name = SCAT3(ro_memslot, _access, _with_af), \
> + .name = SCAT2(ro_memslot, _access), \
You should explicitly call out these sort of drive-by/opportunistic
changes in the commit message as being just that reviewers don't get
lost figuring out how it relates to the functional change of this
patch.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
