On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:23 AM Ben Gardon <bgardon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +static void run_vcpus_get_page_stats(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_page_stats *stats, const char *stage)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + iteration++;
> + for (i = 0; i < VCPUS; i++) {
> + while (READ_ONCE(vcpu_last_completed_iteration[i]) !=
> + iteration)
> + ;
> + }
> +
> + get_page_stats(vm, stats, stage);
get_page_stats() is already called in run_test() explicitly for other
stats. I think it's better to split this function and make the flow
like:
run_vcpus_till_iteration(iteration++);
get_page_stats(vm, &stats_populated, "populating memory");
This makes it easy to follow run_test_till_iteration() and easy to see
where stats are collected. run_test_till_iteration() can also be a
library function used by other tests like dirty_log_perf_test
> + dirty_log_manual_caps = 0;
> + for_each_guest_mode(run_test, NULL);
> +
> + dirty_log_manual_caps =
> + kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2);
> +
> + if (dirty_log_manual_caps) {
> + dirty_log_manual_caps &= (KVM_DIRTY_LOG_MANUAL_PROTECT_ENABLE |
> + KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET);
> + for_each_guest_mode(run_test, NULL);
> + }
Should there be a message to show that this capability is not tested
as it is not available?
Or, there can be a command line option to explicitly provide intent of
testing combined, split modes, or both? Then test can error out
accordingly.
