Hi Ricardo,
On 1/9/23 22:17, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Modify all tests checking overflows to support both 32 (PMCR_EL0.LP == 0)
> and 64-bit overflows (PMCR_EL0.LP == 1). 64-bit overflows are only
> supported on PMUv3p5.
>
> Note that chained tests do not implement "overflow_at_64bits == true".
> That's because there are no CHAIN events when "PMCR_EL0.LP == 1" (for more
> details see AArch64.IncrementEventCounter() pseudocode in the ARM ARM DDI
> 0487H.a, J1.1.1 "aarch64/debug").
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arm/pmu.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
> index 0d06b59..72d0f50 100644
> --- a/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #define PMU_PMCR_X (1 << 4)
> #define PMU_PMCR_DP (1 << 5)
> #define PMU_PMCR_LC (1 << 6)
> +#define PMU_PMCR_LP (1 << 7)
> #define PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT 11
> #define PMU_PMCR_N_MASK 0x1f
> #define PMU_PMCR_ID_SHIFT 16
> @@ -56,9 +57,13 @@
>
> #define ALL_SET 0x00000000FFFFFFFFULL
> #define ALL_CLEAR 0x0000000000000000ULL
> -#define PRE_OVERFLOW 0x00000000FFFFFFF0ULL
> +#define PRE_OVERFLOW_32 0x00000000FFFFFFF0ULL
> +#define PRE_OVERFLOW_64 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF0ULL
> #define PRE_OVERFLOW2 0x00000000FFFFFFDCULL
>
> +#define PRE_OVERFLOW(__overflow_at_64bits) \
> + (__overflow_at_64bits ? PRE_OVERFLOW_64 : PRE_OVERFLOW_32)
> +
> #define PMU_PPI 23
>
> struct pmu {
> @@ -449,8 +454,10 @@ static bool check_overflow_prerequisites(bool overflow_at_64bits)
> static void test_basic_event_count(bool overflow_at_64bits)
> {
> uint32_t implemented_counter_mask, non_implemented_counter_mask;
> - uint32_t counter_mask;
> + uint64_t pre_overflow = PRE_OVERFLOW(overflow_at_64bits);
> + uint64_t pmcr_lp = overflow_at_64bits ? PMU_PMCR_LP : 0;
> uint32_t events[] = {CPU_CYCLES, INST_RETIRED};
> + uint32_t counter_mask;
>
> if (!satisfy_prerequisites(events, ARRAY_SIZE(events)) ||
> !check_overflow_prerequisites(overflow_at_64bits))
> @@ -472,13 +479,13 @@ static void test_basic_event_count(bool overflow_at_64bits)
> * clear cycle and all event counters and allow counter enablement
> * through PMCNTENSET. LC is RES1.
> */
> - set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_LC | PMU_PMCR_C | PMU_PMCR_P);
> + set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_LC | PMU_PMCR_C | PMU_PMCR_P | pmcr_lp);
> isb();
> - report(get_pmcr() == (pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_LC), "pmcr: reset counters");
> + report(get_pmcr() == (pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_LC | pmcr_lp), "pmcr: reset counters");
>
> /* Preset counter #0 to pre overflow value to trigger an overflow */
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> - report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == PRE_OVERFLOW,
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, pre_overflow);
> + report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == pre_overflow,
> "counter #0 preset to pre-overflow value");
> report(!read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1), "counter #1 is 0");
>
> @@ -531,6 +538,8 @@ static void test_mem_access(bool overflow_at_64bits)
> {
> void *addr = malloc(PAGE_SIZE);
> uint32_t events[] = {MEM_ACCESS, MEM_ACCESS};
> + uint64_t pre_overflow = PRE_OVERFLOW(overflow_at_64bits);
> + uint64_t pmcr_lp = overflow_at_64bits ? PMU_PMCR_LP : 0;
>
> if (!satisfy_prerequisites(events, ARRAY_SIZE(events)) ||
> !check_overflow_prerequisites(overflow_at_64bits))
> @@ -542,7 +551,7 @@ static void test_mem_access(bool overflow_at_64bits)
> write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, MEM_ACCESS | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> isb();
> - mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> + mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E | pmcr_lp);
> report_info("counter #0 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)", read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0));
> report_info("counter #1 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)", read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1));
> /* We may measure more than 20 mem access depending on the core */
> @@ -552,11 +561,11 @@ static void test_mem_access(bool overflow_at_64bits)
>
> pmu_reset();
>
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, pre_overflow);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, pre_overflow);
> write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> isb();
> - mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> + mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E | pmcr_lp);
> report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x3,
> "Ran 20 mem accesses with expected overflows on both counters");
> report_info("cnt#0 = %ld cnt#1=%ld overflow=0x%lx",
> @@ -566,8 +575,10 @@ static void test_mem_access(bool overflow_at_64bits)
>
> static void test_sw_incr(bool overflow_at_64bits)
> {
> + uint64_t pre_overflow = PRE_OVERFLOW(overflow_at_64bits);
> + uint64_t pmcr_lp = overflow_at_64bits ? PMU_PMCR_LP : 0;
> uint32_t events[] = {SW_INCR, SW_INCR};
> - uint64_t cntr0 = (PRE_OVERFLOW + 100) & pmevcntr_mask();
> + uint64_t cntr0 = (pre_overflow + 100) & pmevcntr_mask();
> int i;
>
> if (!satisfy_prerequisites(events, ARRAY_SIZE(events)) ||
> @@ -581,7 +592,7 @@ static void test_sw_incr(bool overflow_at_64bits)
> /* enable counters #0 and #1 */
> write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
>
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, pre_overflow);
> isb();
>
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
> @@ -589,14 +600,14 @@ static void test_sw_incr(bool overflow_at_64bits)
>
> isb();
> report_info("SW_INCR counter #0 has value %ld", read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0));
> - report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == PRE_OVERFLOW,
> + report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == pre_overflow,
> "PWSYNC does not increment if PMCR.E is unset");
>
> pmu_reset();
>
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, pre_overflow);
> write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> - set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> + set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E | pmcr_lp);
> isb();
>
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
> @@ -614,6 +625,7 @@ static void test_sw_incr(bool overflow_at_64bits)
> static void test_chained_counters(bool unused)
> {
> uint32_t events[] = {CPU_CYCLES, CHAIN};
> + uint64_t all_set = pmevcntr_mask();
ALL_SET_32 may be enough, as suggested by Reiji;
>
> if (!satisfy_prerequisites(events, ARRAY_SIZE(events)))
> return;
> @@ -624,7 +636,7 @@ static void test_chained_counters(bool unused)
> write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> /* enable counters #0 and #1 */
> write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
>
> precise_instrs_loop(22, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
>
> @@ -636,26 +648,26 @@ static void test_chained_counters(bool unused)
> pmu_reset();
> write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
>
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
> write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, 0x1);
> precise_instrs_loop(22, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> report_info("overflow reg = 0x%lx", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
> report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == 2, "CHAIN counter #1 set to 2");
> report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x1, "overflow recorded for chained incr #2");
>
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, ALL_SET);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, all_set);
and here
>
> precise_instrs_loop(22, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> report_info("overflow reg = 0x%lx", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
> - report(!read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1), "CHAIN counter #1 wrapped");
> + report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == 0, "CHAIN counter #1 wrapped");
> report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x3, "overflow on even and odd counters");
> }
>
> static void test_chained_sw_incr(bool unused)
> {
> uint32_t events[] = {SW_INCR, CHAIN};
> - uint64_t cntr0 = (PRE_OVERFLOW + 100) & pmevcntr_mask();
> + uint64_t cntr0 = (PRE_OVERFLOW_32 + 100) & pmevcntr_mask();
> uint64_t cntr1 = (ALL_SET + 1) & pmevcntr_mask();
> int i;
the chained counter changes may be put in a separate patch to help the
reviewer focus on the new 64b overflow tests.
>
> @@ -669,7 +681,7 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(bool unused)
> /* enable counters #0 and #1 */
> write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
>
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
> set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> isb();
>
> @@ -687,7 +699,7 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(bool unused)
> pmu_reset();
>
> write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, events[1] | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
> write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, ALL_SET);
> write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> @@ -726,7 +738,7 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
>
> /* Only enable even counter */
> pmu_reset();
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
> write_sysreg_s(0x1, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> isb();
>
> @@ -856,6 +868,9 @@ static bool expect_interrupts(uint32_t bitmap)
>
> static void test_overflow_interrupt(bool overflow_at_64bits)
> {
> + uint64_t pre_overflow = PRE_OVERFLOW(overflow_at_64bits);
> + uint64_t all_set = pmevcntr_mask();
> + uint64_t pmcr_lp = overflow_at_64bits ? PMU_PMCR_LP : 0;
> uint32_t events[] = {MEM_ACCESS, SW_INCR};
> void *addr = malloc(PAGE_SIZE);
> int i;
> @@ -874,16 +889,16 @@ static void test_overflow_interrupt(bool overflow_at_64bits)
> write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 0, MEM_ACCESS | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, SW_INCR | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, pre_overflow);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, pre_overflow);
> isb();
>
> /* interrupts are disabled (PMINTENSET_EL1 == 0) */
>
> - mem_access_loop(addr, 200, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> + mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E | pmcr_lp);
I noticed that undocumented change. Is it done on purpose?
> report(expect_interrupts(0), "no overflow interrupt after preset");
>
> - set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> + set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E | pmcr_lp);
> isb();
>
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
> @@ -898,12 +913,12 @@ static void test_overflow_interrupt(bool overflow_at_64bits)
>
> pmu_reset_stats();
>
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, pre_overflow);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, pre_overflow);
> write_sysreg(ALL_SET, pmintenset_el1);
> isb();
>
> - mem_access_loop(addr, 200, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> + mem_access_loop(addr, 200, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E | pmcr_lp);
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
> write_sysreg(0x3, pmswinc_el0);
>
> @@ -912,25 +927,40 @@ static void test_overflow_interrupt(bool overflow_at_64bits)
> report(expect_interrupts(0x3),
> "overflow interrupts expected on #0 and #1");
>
> - /* promote to 64-b */
> + /*
> + * promote to 64-b:
> + *
> + * This only applies to the !overflow_at_64bits case, as
> + * overflow_at_64bits doesn't implement CHAIN events. The
> + * overflow_at_64bits case just checks that chained counters are
> + * not incremented when PMCR.LP == 1.
> + */
>
> pmu_reset_stats();
>
> write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, pre_overflow);
> isb();
> - mem_access_loop(addr, 200, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> - report(expect_interrupts(0x1),
> - "expect overflow interrupt on 32b boundary");
> + mem_access_loop(addr, 200, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E | pmcr_lp);
> + report(expect_interrupts(0x1), "expect overflow interrupt");
>
> /* overflow on odd counter */
> pmu_reset_stats();
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> - write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, ALL_SET);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, pre_overflow);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, all_set);
> isb();
> - mem_access_loop(addr, 400, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> - report(expect_interrupts(0x3),
> - "expect overflow interrupt on even and odd counter");
> + mem_access_loop(addr, 400, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E | pmcr_lp);
> + if (overflow_at_64bits) {
> + report(expect_interrupts(0x1),
> + "expect overflow interrupt on even counter");
> + report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == all_set,
> + "Odd counter did not change");
> + } else {
> + report(expect_interrupts(0x3),
> + "expect overflow interrupt on even and odd counter");
> + report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) != all_set,
> + "Odd counter wrapped");
> + }
> }
> #endif
>
> @@ -1131,10 +1161,13 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> report_prefix_pop();
> } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "pmu-basic-event-count") == 0) {
> run_test(argv[1], test_basic_event_count, false);
> + run_test(argv[1], test_basic_event_count, true);
> } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "pmu-mem-access") == 0) {
> run_test(argv[1], test_mem_access, false);
> + run_test(argv[1], test_mem_access, true);
> } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "pmu-sw-incr") == 0) {
> run_test(argv[1], test_sw_incr, false);
> + run_test(argv[1], test_sw_incr, true);
> } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "pmu-chained-counters") == 0) {
> run_test(argv[1], test_chained_counters, false);
> } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "pmu-chained-sw-incr") == 0) {
> @@ -1143,6 +1176,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> run_test(argv[1], test_chain_promotion, false);
> } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "pmu-overflow-interrupt") == 0) {
> run_test(argv[1], test_overflow_interrupt, false);
> + run_test(argv[1], test_overflow_interrupt, true);
> } else {
> report_abort("Unknown sub-test '%s'", argv[1]);
> }
Thanks
Eric
