Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 6/9] s390x: define a macro for the stack frame size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/16/23 18:57, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
Define and use a macro for the stack frame size.

There are two more instances in s390x/macros.S and there might be some in s390x/gs.c.


Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c | 1 +
  s390x/cstart64.S        | 2 +-
  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c b/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
index f612f3277a95..188dd2e51181 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ int main(void)
  	OFFSET(STACK_FRAME_INT_GRS0, stack_frame_int, grs0);
  	OFFSET(STACK_FRAME_INT_GRS1, stack_frame_int, grs1);
  	DEFINE(STACK_FRAME_INT_SIZE, sizeof(struct stack_frame_int));
+	DEFINE(STACK_FRAME_SIZE, sizeof(struct stack_frame));

I'm wondering why we didn't do this when Pierre introduced the int stacks...

return 0;
  }
diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
index 6f83da2a6c0a..468ace3ea4df 100644
--- a/s390x/cstart64.S
+++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ start:
  	/* setup stack */
  	larl	%r15, stackptr
  	/* Clear first stack frame */
-	xc      0(160,%r15), 0(%r15)
+	xc      0(STACK_FRAME_SIZE,%r15), 0(%r15)
  	/* setup initial PSW mask + control registers*/
  	larl	%r1, initial_psw
  	lpswe	0(%r1)




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux