On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 08:03 -0800, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > > Better mention the tdx_enable() is implemented in another patch? But I guess > > we need a wrapper here so that the compilation would succeed. > > The coverletter mentions it. I'll make the commit message of this patch > mention it anyway. When this series is merged, the TDX host series must have already been merged. You obviously don't need to say something like "tdx_enable() is implemented in another patch/series" in _changelog_.
