Re: (qemu)info registers -- Not working for me.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Zachery Salwasser wrote:
> I have been having trouble with reading the extended registers
> normally read by kvm_get_sregs() on host kernels ~2.6.32 and higher.
> 
> I am currently running Linux 2.6.32-8, kvm-kmod 2.6.32.8, and qemu 0.12.2.
> 
> I get the following output when I try info registers on the qemu console:
> 
> (qemu) info registers
> EAX=6d63c93d EBX=ffdffc70 ECX=ffdffc70 EDX=00000000
> ESI=ffdffc50 EDI=823e7b68 EBP=80550f50 ESP=80550f34
> EIP=f8621d3e EFL=00000246 [---Z-P-] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
> ES =3d65 00001000 b772bdf8 3fffe800 DPL=3 Reserved
> CS =4fe1 b7d59ff4 b7d5b3a0 6b300100
> SS =0000 b772bde8 0847ab38 6f300a00
> DS =b3d0 b7d5b3cc 00000000 7bffd500 DPL=2 DS   [E-A]
> FS =e008 b7d5b3a0 b7d59ff4 005bb900 DPL=1 CS32 [--A]
> GS =ffff ffffffff 00000007 7fffff00 DPL=3 CS64 [CRA]
> LDT=9ff4 b772bde0 00000008 7ffff500 DPL=3 DS   [E-A]
> TR =0000 00000080 b7fb63ab 00f00000
> GDT=     00014fe1 00000100
> IDT=     b7d5b3cc 0000b3d0
> CR0=08000101 CR2=00002000 CR3=00000000 CR4=08000101
> DR0=00000000 DR1=00000000 DR2=00000000 DR3=00000000
> DR6=ffff0ff0 DR7=00000000
> FCW=027f FSW=0000 [ST=0] FTW=00 MXCSR=00000000
> FPR0=0000000000000000 ffff FPR1=00ff00ff00ff00ff ffff
> FPR2=0000000000000000 ffff FPR3=00fe000d009900ee ffff
> FPR4=ff0d9aefff6a604c ffff FPR5=00ff000d009a00ef ffff
> FPR6=0000000000000000 ffff FPR7=0080008000800080 ffff
> XMM00=
> 00000020000000000000000000000001 XMM01=81181ab88055f980e115d00000000020
> XMM02=f79092a481181ab8c03845740dd1d000 XMM03=81181ab8c03845740000016d804e93e0
> XMM04=c0384574000000000000000100000000 XMM05=e1150000804e7e36f790931400000000
> XMM06=806f02980000000000000000c0384574 XMM07=000000028055f62000000080c0384574
> 
> Note that cr3 is 0, which doesn't seem possible.  The contents of the
> sregs is also static across invocations of info registers (whereas the
> "regs" chang), indicating that the values that are there are garbage.
> 
> Delving deeper, when I check actual invocations of kvm_get_sregs(), it
> usually returns either 0 or -22, neither value indicating success.

-22 indicates something bad is happening. Maybe sizeof(struct kvm_sregs)
is different from kernel and user space POV on your host. That would
cause KVM_GET_SREGS to have different values, thus the kernel would be
unable to dispatch the request. Could you check this?

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux