Ingo Molnar wrote: > I'm not trolling you at all: is it _really_ not obvious to you that the > KVM/qemu usability status quo honestly sucks, to an unbiased observer? I agree that for desktop-style (e.g. vmware workstation) style virtualisation, the plain QEMU+KVM package is terrible. However, in the case of Enterprise server virtualisation, a lot your comments relate to things that do not matter - sound, graphics, GUI, X integration. In the former use-case, it definitely needs significant work on the usability front. In the later use-case, libvirt, RHEV etc all provide a (some argue) decent interface, which removes the remaining niggles around obscure command line options. Which one is QEMU+KVM trying to be? IMO it is succeeding far, far better at server workloads than desktop usage. Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
