* Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/26/2010 03:16 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >* Avi Kivity<avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>> That was not what i suggested tho. tools/kvm/ would work plenty fine. > >>> > >> I'll wait until we have tools/libc and tools/X. After all, they affect a > >> lot more people and are concerned with a lot more kernel/user interfaces > >> than kvm. > > > > So your answer can be summed up as: 'we wont do what makes sense > > technically because others suck even more' ? > > I can sum up your this remark as 'whenever you disagree with me, I will > rephrase your words to make you look like an idiot'. Two points: 1) You can try to ridicule me if you want, but do you actually claim that my summary is inaccurate? I do claim it's a substantially accurate summary: you said you will (quote:) "wait with tools/kvm/ until we have tools/libc and tools/X". I do think tools/X and tools/libc would make quite a bit of sense - this is one of the better design aspects of FreeBSD et al. It's a mistake that it's not being done. 2) I used a question mark (the sentence was not a statement of fact), and you have no obligation to agree with the summary i provided. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
