On Tue, Dec 27, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 12/16/22 20:40, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > I was hoping to have a name that communicate_why_ the memslot needs to be > > inhibited, but it's turning out to be really hard to come up with a name that's > > descriptive without being ridiculously verbose. The best I've come up with is: > > > > allow_apicv_in_x2apic_without_x2apic_virtualization > > > > It's heinous, but I'm inclined to go with it unless someone has a better idea. > > Can any of you provide a patch to squash on top of this one (or on top of > kvm/queue, as you prefer)? I'll send patches, though it might take a day or three. I had a reworked version of this series prepped and tested before vacation kicked in, but lost power before I could send my traditional pre-vacation patch bomb :-/
