Re: [PATCH v2 00/50] KVM: Rework kvm_init() and hardware enabling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/50] KVM: Rework kvm_init() and hardware enabling
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:22:10 +0000
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx>, Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@xxxxxxxxx>, Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Albert Ou <aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Durrant <paul@xxxxxxx>, James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>, Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@xxxxxxxxx>, Atish Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@xxxxxxxxx>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>, Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx>, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx>, Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20221227130249.1650197-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
References: <20221227130249.1650197-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
User-agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.13

On 2022-12-27 13:02, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

Queued, thanks. I will leave this in kvm/queue after testingeverything
else and moving it to kvm/next; this way, we can wait for test results
on other architectures.


Can you please make this a topic branch, and if possible based
on a released -rc? It would make it a lot easier for everyone.

Thanks,

        M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/50] KVM: Rework kvm_init() and hardware enabling
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/50] KVM: Rework kvm_init() and hardware enabling
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

References:
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/50] KVM: Rework kvm_init() and hardware enabling
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Remove the second definition of pr_fmt in hyperv.c
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 00/50] KVM: Rework kvm_init() and hardware enabling
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 00/50] KVM: Rework kvm_init() and hardware enabling
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 00/50] KVM: Rework kvm_init() and hardware enabling
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]