Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: Clear XTILE_CFG if XTILE_DATA is clear

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 12:44 PM Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> > > index 0b5bf013fcb8e..2d9910847786a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> > > @@ -977,6 +977,10 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 function)
> > >                 u64 permitted_xcr0 = kvm_caps.supported_xcr0 & xstate_get_guest_group_perm();
> > >                 u64 permitted_xss = kvm_caps.supported_xss;
> > >
> > > +               if (!(permitted_xcr0 & XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE_CFG) ||
> > > +                   !(permitted_xcr0 & XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE_DATA))
> > > +                       permitted_xcr0 &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE;
> > > +
> > >                 entry->eax &= permitted_xcr0;
> > >                 entry->ebx = xstate_required_size(permitted_xcr0, false);
> > >                 entry->ecx = entry->ebx;
> > > --
> > > 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog
> > >
> >
> > Two questions:
> >
> > 1) Under what circumstances would this happen?
> This would happen if userspace hasn't opted in to using AMX via arch_prctl().
>
> > 2) Shouldn't we also clear XFEATURE_MASK_CFG if both bits are not set?
> Both CFG and DATA are cleared with XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE.  It defines both.
Doh!

Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux