On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 02:04:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 10:25 AM Shunsuke Mie <mie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > struct vringh_iov is defined to hold userland addresses. However, to use > > common function, __vring_iov, finally the vringh_iov converts to the > > vringh_kiov with simple cast. It includes compile time check code to make > > sure it can be cast correctly. > > > > To simplify the code, this patch removes the struct vringh_iov and unifies > > APIs to struct vringh_kiov. > > > > Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Mie <mie@xxxxxxxxxx> > > While at this, I wonder if we need to go further, that is, switch to > using an iov iterator instead of a vringh customized one. > > Thanks Possibly, but when doing changes like this one needs to be careful to avoid breaking all the inlining tricks vringh relies on for performance. -- MST