On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 06:53:53PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Hey Jisheng,
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 01:46:23AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > We will make use of ISA extension in asm files, so make the multi-letter
> > RISC-V ISA extension IDs macros rather than enums and move them and
> > those base ISA extension IDs to suitable place.
>
> Which base ISA extension IDs? Changelog should match the patch contents,
> and it's a little unclear here since the base ISA extension IDs are
> visible here but in the context not the diff.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> > index b22525290073..996884986fea 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> > @@ -12,20 +12,6 @@
> > #include <linux/bits.h>
> > #include <uapi/asm/hwcap.h>
> >
> > -#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > -#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> > -/*
> > - * This yields a mask that user programs can use to figure out what
> > - * instruction set this cpu supports.
> > - */
> > -#define ELF_HWCAP (elf_hwcap)
> > -
> > -enum {
> > - CAP_HWCAP = 1,
> > -};
> > -
> > -extern unsigned long elf_hwcap;
> > -
> > #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_a ('a' - 'a')
> > #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_c ('c' - 'a')
> > #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_d ('d' - 'a')
> > @@ -46,22 +32,33 @@ extern unsigned long elf_hwcap;
> > #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_BASE 26
> >
> > /*
> > - * This enum represent the logical ID for each multi-letter RISC-V ISA extension.
> > + * These macros represent the logical ID for each multi-letter RISC-V ISA extension.
> > * The logical ID should start from RISCV_ISA_EXT_BASE and must not exceed
> > * RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX. 0-25 range is reserved for single letter
> > * extensions while all the multi-letter extensions should define the next
> > * available logical extension id.
> > */
> > -enum riscv_isa_ext_id {
> > - RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF = RISCV_ISA_EXT_BASE,
> > - RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT,
> > - RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM,
> > - RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE,
> > - RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC,
> > - RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL,
> > - RISCV_ISA_EXT_ID_MAX = RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX,
> > +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF 26
> > +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT 27
> > +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM 28
> > +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE 29
> > +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC 30
> > +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL 31
>
> Could you re-order these alphabetically when you move them please?
On reflection, this is a horrific idea - don't bother. It'd only be
temporary anyway as it'd need massaging when the next extension comes
along.
Either people will have a slightly harder seeing if something is added,
or a "slightly" harder time finding which is the next free number or
have to reshuffle the whole thing.
The latter sounds like a prime bug breeding ground, while the former is
just a search away.
So yeah, don't bother & apologies for the noise!
> > +
> > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> > +/*
> > + * This yields a mask that user programs can use to figure out what
> > + * instruction set this cpu supports.
> > + */
> > +#define ELF_HWCAP (elf_hwcap)
> > +
> > +enum {
> > + CAP_HWCAP = 1,
> > };
> >
> > +extern unsigned long elf_hwcap;
> > +
> > /*
> > * This enum represents the logical ID for each RISC-V ISA extension static
> > * keys. We can use static key to optimize code path if some ISA extensions
> > --
> > 2.37.2
> >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
