Re: [PATCH v10 105/108] KVM: TDX: Add methods to ignore accesses to CPU state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2022-10-29 at 23:23 -0700, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> +static u8 vt_get_mt_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, bool is_mmio)
> +{
> +	if (is_td_vcpu(vcpu)) {
> +		if (is_mmio)
> +			return MTRR_TYPE_UNCACHABLE << VMX_EPT_MT_EPTE_SHIFT;
> +		return  MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK << VMX_EPT_MT_EPTE_SHIFT;
> +	}
> +
> +	return vmx_get_mt_mask(vcpu, gfn, is_mmio);
> +}

So you are returning WB for _ALL_ guest memory, including shared.  Wouldn't this
break MTRR handling for shared memory?  For instance, IIUC we can still support
assigning a device to a TDX guest while the VT-d doesn't support coherent
memory, in which case guest's MTRR/PAT are honored.  I think this should also
apply to TDX guest's shared memory?





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux