Re: [PATCH 05/14] KVM: selftests: Fix a typo in x86-64's kvm_get_cpu_address_width()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13/12/22 01:16, Sean Christopherson wrote:
Fix a == vs. = typo in kvm_get_cpu_address_width() that results in
@pa_bits being left unset if the CPU doesn't support enumerating its
MAX_PHY_ADDR.  Flagged by clang's unusued-value warning.

lib/x86_64/processor.c:1034:51: warning: expression result unused [-Wunused-value]
                 *pa_bits == kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAE) ? 36 : 32;

Fixes: 3bd396353d18 ("KVM: selftests: Add X86_FEATURE_PAE and use it calc "fallback" MAXPHYADDR")
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
index c4d368d56cfe..acfa1d01e7df 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
@@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ bool is_amd_cpu(void)
  void kvm_get_cpu_address_width(unsigned int *pa_bits, unsigned int *va_bits)
  {
  	if (!kvm_cpu_has_p(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_PHY_ADDR)) {
-		*pa_bits == kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAE) ? 36 : 32;
+		*pa_bits = kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAE) ? 36 : 32;

:)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux