On 12/9/22 16:43, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 12/8/22 10:44, Pierre Morel wrote:
The guest uses the STSI instruction to get information on the
CPU topology.
Let us implement the STSI instruction for the basis CPU topology
level, level 2.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
...
+#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAX_MNEST 2
+
+void insert_stsi_15_1_x(S390CPU *cpu, int sel2, __u64 addr, uint8_t ar)
+{
+ union {
+ char place_holder[S390_TOPOLOGY_SYSIB_SIZE];
+ SysIB_151x sysib;
+ } buffer QEMU_ALIGNED(8);
+ int len;
+
+ if (s390_is_pv() || !s390_has_topology() ||
Isn't the test s390_is_pv() redundant since patch 6 deactivates
S390_FEAT_CONFIGURATION_TOPOLOGY for PV guests ?
Yes you are right it is.
I remove it.
Regards,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
