On 12/8/22 3:26 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > - S390 has unconditionally claimed it has secure MSI through the iommu > driver. I'm not sure how it works, or if it even does. Perhaps > zpci_set_airq() pushes the "zdev->gias" to the hypervisor which > limits a device's MSI to only certain KVM contexts (though if true > this would be considered insecure by VFIO) > There are a few layers here. Interrupt isolation and mapping on s390 is accomplished via a mapping table used by a layer of firmware (and can be shared by a hypervisor e.g. qemu/kvm) that sits between the device and the kernel/driver (s390 linux always runs on at least this 'bare-metal hypervisor' firmware layer). Indeed the initial relationship is established via zpci_set_airq -- the "zdev->fh" identifies the device, the "zdev->gisa" (if applicable) identifies the single KVM context that is eligible to receive interrupts related to the specified device as well as the single KVM context allowed to access the device via any zPCI instructions (e.g. config space access). The aibv/noi indicate the vector mappings that are authorized for that device; firmware will typically route the interrupts to the guest without hypervisor involvement once this is established, but the table is shared by the hypervisor so that it can be tapped to complete delivery when necessary. This registration process enables a firmware intermediary that will only pass along MSI from the device that has an associated, previously-authorized vector, associated with either the 'bare-metal hypervisor' (gisa = 0) and/or a specific VM (gisa != 0), depending what was registered as zpci_set_airq.
